githubEdit

CIP-1694: Pluralism Now!

CIP-1694: Pluralism Now! After Town Hall Discussion hosted by Kenric Nelson (Photrek) and Stephen Whitenstall (QADAO)

CIP-1694: Pluralism Now! After Town Hall Discussion hosted by Kenric Nelson (Photrek) and Stephen Whitenstall (QADAO)

CIP-1694 - https://github.com/JaredCorduan/CIPs/...arrow-up-right

CIP-1694 Comment Thread - https://github.com/cardano-foundation...arrow-up-right

Code: https://github.com/Photrek/Cardano-Ca...arrow-up-right

Discussion: https://github.com/Photrek/Cardano-Ca...arrow-up-right

Previous ATH on Decentralization: • CIP-1694: Is Decentralization Possible? arrow-up-right ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timestamps

Welcome - Kenric - 00:08arrow-up-right

Introduction - 00:18arrow-up-right

"All the President's Bankers" - 02:40arrow-up-right - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomi_Prinsarrow-up-right

Decentralization as a cover for plutocracy - 05:56arrow-up-right

"identity verification is very difficult without some centralized oracle" - 06:50arrow-up-right

"Reducing the power of entities with large amounts of Ada" - 07:53arrow-up-right

Wealth as a replacement of Identity - 09:12arrow-up-right

Edinburgh Workshop - Steph - Wolfram- 11:28arrow-up-right

Merging of CIP-1694 - Jenny - 15:08arrow-up-right

Voluntary release of control - Eystein - 16:21arrow-up-right ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mathematica Notebook "A Plural Voting Design for Cardano’s Delegated Representatives using Hyper-Plutocratic Deposits for Sybil Resistance" - 18:08arrow-up-right

CIP-1694 voting mechanism - 19:20arrow-up-right

Delegate Weight will be pluralism - 20:30arrow-up-right

Deposit Weight will be "hyper plutocratic" Sybil Resistance Mechanism - 21:13arrow-up-right

Minimum deposit will match minimum delegation - 23:40arrow-up-right

Analysis of Delegate & Deposit Weight - 24:22arrow-up-right

Graph " log-log plot shows how the voting weight for the delegate and the deposit have opposite slopes as the number of wallets is increased" - 27:06arrow-up-right

"Deciding power becomes marginal ?" - Thorsten - 30:28arrow-up-right

Reducing the significance of the power law distribution tail - 31:32arrow-up-right

Cauchy Distribution - 32:06arrow-up-right

Comparison with Brexit voting (influence of marginal votes)- 33:30arrow-up-right - Thorsten

From the Mean to the Median - (true representation of the community) - 34:21arrow-up-right

Pluralism as Quadratic Voting - Steph - Wolfram - 36:05arrow-up-right

A whale splitting across wallets - (applying voting power constraints) - 36:30arrow-up-right

Why no rule preventing this breakdown ? - 37:25arrow-up-right

Because of the lack of an ID constraint - 37:45arrow-up-right

Splitting a wallet to increase votes constrained by deposit - 38:04arrow-up-right

Example - A modest delegation with a minimum deposit cannot split into two wallets - 39:15arrow-up-right

This proposal proposes a deposit, so dReps will become like SPOs ? - Ninh - 40:33arrow-up-right

The size of your deposit will effect how many votes you are eligible for - 41:31arrow-up-right

Weakness of a dRep collaborating with a Whale voter ? - Ninh - 42:20arrow-up-right

Graph - Even with an investment of 10,000 for the deposits, the maximum votes is limited to 10 wallets - 42:55arrow-up-right

Possibility of benefit limited by scale and much less than 1C1V- 43:40arrow-up-right

Graph - DReps deposits of 10,000 ADA to increase delegation to 10 million ADA requires reduction in no of wallets - 45:06arrow-up-right Need to address Sybil Resistance - 46:10arrow-up-right

Thresholds would not change overall proportion of votes ? - Marek - 47:13arrow-up-right

CIP-1694 is linear (1c1v) whilst plural voting takes square root - 48:12arrow-up-right

Every dRep will try to be top of the curve ? - Marek - 49:17arrow-up-right

Voting power calculations - 50:10arrow-up-right

How will changes protect against Sybil attack ? - Marek - 51:33arrow-up-right

1c1v not a Sybil Attack ? - Assumption of independence of each ADA/Vote pair - 52:46arrow-up-right

Acceptance of implicit "Sybil Attack" in 1C1V - 53:38arrow-up-right

(Acceptance of the correlation of voting with plutocratic wealth) Graph - Spread of delegates across wallets - (Sybil resistance in the range of 100 to 10^5 votes) - 54:10arrow-up-right

Graph - Analysis of DRep Votes using multiple wallets - 55:21arrow-up-right

Transaction fees as a deterrent - Ken - 55:51arrow-up-right

dRep deposit as annual fee - 57:37arrow-up-right

Voting power dependent on stake pool rewards - Thorsten - 1:00:08arrow-up-right

Time period for holding pledge - Ninh - 1:02:18arrow-up-right

Sybil Resistance requires ID or some cost (resource or reputation) - 1:03:05arrow-up-right

Pair-wise co-ordination Sybil resistance - (vbuterin) - 1:03:52arrow-up-right (https://ethresear.ch/t/pairwise-coord...arrow-up-right)

Tracking history of dRep wallets -1:03:52arrow-up-right

(highly correlated wallets discounted) Graph - Analysis of solo DRep -1:05:45arrow-up-right

Whale creating 1000 wallets - 1:06:45arrow-up-right

How voting distribution normalizes - 1:08:19arrow-up-right

10k wallets - CIP-1694 bootstrapping - 1:09:18arrow-up-right

General discussion - 1:10:25arrow-up-right

Conclusion - Kenric - 1:10:40arrow-up-right

Last updated